Iraq probes $2.5 billion ‛theft’ from its tax agency

By Syria & Iraq Newsroom/AFP

Iraqi authorities are investigating the “theft” of $2.5 billion from the tax authority, officials said Sunday, in the latest corruption case to hit the country.

State news agency INA reported Saturday that an internal probe by the finance ministry found the money had been withdrawn from the agency’s account at a state-owned bank. The ministry has asked the government’s anti-corruption body to investigate, INA said, without naming the officials embroiled in the case. Prime minister-designate Mohammad Shia al-Sudani has vowed to tackle endemic corruption in the country and tweeted on Sunday: “We will not allow Iraqis’ money to be robbed. We will never hesitate to take real measures to stop the corruption that has so brazenly spread across all levels of government.”

The finance ministry’s probe uncovered “the theft of 3.7 trillion Iraqi dinars (about $2.5 billion) from the account of the general commission for taxes at Rafidain Bank”, INA reported. Local media have published a document from the tax authority showing the money had been withdrawn between September 2021 and August 2022. It had been transferred to the accounts of five different companies using 247 cheques, and immediately withdrawn from those accounts.

“Who are the real owners of these companies?” asked Iraqi political analyst Sajad Jiyad on Twitter. “Who authorized these cheques to be given to the companies? How did it go undetected for a year, and which politicians are complicit?”, Ihsan Ismail, the recently discharged acting finance minister, pointed to a “specific group” in a Saturday statement, without elaborating.

The anti-corruption commission announced Sunday it has launched an investigation, and said in a statement that it will provide the judiciary with all the information and documents it gathers “so that it can make the appropriate decisions” on individuals implicated in the case. Iraq ranks a lowly 157 out of 180 countries in Transparency International’s corruption perceptions index. Criminal charges are rare in Iraq and usually limited to mid-level government officials. “Pervasive corruption is a major root cause of Iraqi dysfunctionality,” UN envoy Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert told the Security Council in early October. “And frankly, no leader can claim to be shielded from it.”

Joint Statement on the U.S.-Iraq Strategic Dialogue [text]

The text of the following statement was released by the Governments of the United States of America and the Republic of Iraq.

The delegations of the Republic of Iraq, led by Dr. Fuad Hussein, Iraq’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, and the United States of America, led by Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken, co-chaired the final session of the Strategic Dialogue, initiated on June 11, 2020, in accordance with the 2008 Strategic Framework Agreement for a Relationship of Friendship and Cooperation between the United States of America and the Republic of Iraq (SFA). The Iraqi delegation also included representatives of the Kurdistan Regional Government.

The two sides reaffirmed the importance of these discussions, which focused on strengthening the long-term strategic partnership defined by the SFA and on key issues of mutual concern: regional stability, public health, climate change, energy efficiency, energy independence, humanitarian aid, human rights, economic cooperation, and cultural and educational exchanges, among other issues. Iraq provided a detailed accounting of its efforts to promote the safe and voluntary return of internally displaced persons to their home regions, and the United States pledged its continued support in this regard.

The two delegations reaffirmed the principles agreed upon in the SFA. The United States reaffirmed its respect for Iraq’s sovereignty and laws and pledged to continue providing the resources Iraq needs to preserve its territorial integrity. The Government of Iraq reaffirmed its commitment to protect Coalition personnel advising and enabling the Iraqi Security Forces (ISF) and reasserted its position that all Coalition Forces are in Iraq at its invitation. The two delegations also emphasized that the bases hosting U.S. and other Coalition personnel are Iraqi bases and are operating per existing Iraqi laws; they are not U.S. or Coalition bases, and the presence of international personnel in Iraq is solely in support of the Government of Iraq’s fight against ISIS. The delegations decided, following recent technical talks, that the security relationship will fully transition to a training, advising, assisting, and intelligence-sharing role, and that there will be no U.S. forces with a combat role in Iraq by December 31, 2021. The United States intends to continue its support for the ISF, including the Peshmerga, to build their capacity to deal with future threats.

The two delegations confirmed their commitment to the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms, including freedom of the press, through strict adherence to due process of law, national constitutions, and their respective international human rights obligations and commitments. Both sides confirmed that free and fair elections will strengthen Iraq’s sovereignty, democracy, and development. The Iraqi side provided a detailed account of its plans to promote voter participation and ensure the safety of voters, candidates, poll workers, local monitors, civil society groups, and international observers. Both delegations stated their appreciation for the international community’s support, expressed through UN Security Council Resolution 2576 (2021) and concurred that the presence of both a UN Assistance Mission for Iraq (UNAMI) monitoring team and EU observation mission represents a good-faith effort by the international community to support the call of the Iraqi people and the Iraqi government for free and fair elections in October. Iraq welcomed long-running U.S. support for UNAMI, and recent U.S. financial contributions to UNAMI’s electoral-assistance, including for its election monitoring team.

Both sides intend to pursue cooperation in working with international organizations and through intergovernmental processes, including the 26th Conference of the Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, to be held in Glasgow this fall. The United States expressed its support for Iraq’s effort to promote economic reform and enhance regional integration, in particular through energy projects with Jordan and the GCC Interconnection Authority.

The two delegations reaffirmed their determination to preserve and strengthen the strategic relationship, across the full spectrum of bilateral issues, for the sake of their respective national interests and their shared interest in regional stability. The United States and Iraq confirmed that they would resume their discussions through the various coordinating committees enumerated in the SFA.

Qatar accused of funneling millions of dollars to Jabhat al-Nusra: The Times

The Qatari state has been accused of playing a central role in a secret money laundering operation to send hundreds of millions of dollars to jihadists in Syria, according to an investigation by The Times newspaper. A claim issued this week at the High Court in London alleges that a private office of the Gulf state’s monarch was at the heart of clandestine routes by which money was transferred to Jabhat al-Nusra.

Two Qatari banks, several charities, wealthy businessmen, leading politicians and civil servants are among the defendants in a claim for damages lodged by nine Syrians. The claimants allege that each played a part in an alleged conspiracy on behalf of the Qatari state, acting in co-ordination with the Muslim Brotherhood, the Sunni Islamist organization. Qatar is set to host next year’s football World Cup. The conspiracy was driven “by high-ranking members of the Qatari ruling elite” and provided funds to “actively support and facilitate” al-Qaeda-affiliated terrorists in the Syrian civil war, the High Court claim alleges.

Jabhat al-Nusra received hundreds of millions of dollars from Qatari individuals and organisations acting “on behalf of the state of Qatar”, it alleges. Among the named defendants accused of involvement are Hamad bin Jassim al-Thani, Qatar’s former prime minister, and Abdulhadi Mana al-Hajri, the owner of London’s Ritz hotel. Their representatives said the allegations were completely baseless. Categorical denials were issued by every Qatari defendant identified in the claim that was contacted by The Times.

It is alleged in the claim that money was laundered for terrorism via significantly overpriced construction contracts, the purchase of property at inflated prices and overpayments to Syrian migrant workers. The claim alleges the clandestine funding operation was carried out with the Muslim Brotherhood and included meetings in Turkey between prominent Qatari individuals and representatives of jihadist groups operating in Syria. It is claimed that money was transferred from the bank accounts of Qatari companies and charities either to Syria directly or to Turkish banks, where the claimants say it was withdrawn and taken across the border into Syria.

The claim for damages was lodged in the High Court on Wednesday by lawyers representing nine Syrians who allege they suffered severe financial losses or torture, arbitrary detention, threats of execution and other forms of persecution committed by Nusra Front. Among them is a businessman from a prominent Christian family in Syria who was awarded a major hospital construction contract by a Qatari charity. He claims he lost millions of pounds when he refused to participate in the conspiracy. Ben Emmerson QC, of the law firm King & Spalding, is leading the legal team that represents the claimants.

Central to the operation, it is alleged, was the private engineering office of the Amiri Diwan, a Qatari government agency that controls all major construction and development contracts. It receives its directives from Qatar’s emir, Tamim bin Hamad al-Thani. Other defendants alleged to have been involved include:

• Hamad bin Jassim al-Thani, Qatar’s prime minister from 2007 to 2013. His personal wealth is an estimated £2 billion, according to last year’s Sunday Times Rich List.
• Nawaf bin Jassim al-Thani, Hamad’s younger brother, who until March this year chaired a division of Qatar’s sovereign wealth fund that owns a global portfolio of luxury hotels.
• Jassim and Hamad bin Jassim Charitable Foundation, a wealthy charity founded in 2001 and controlled by the bin Jassim al-Thani brothers.
• Abdulhadi Mana al-Hajri, owner of the Ritz hotel in London and brother-in-law of Qatar’s emir.
• Qatar National Bank (QNB), the largest financial institution in the Middle East, which is also the official Qatari bank of the World Cup. It has a UK branch in Mayfair.

The details of their alleged roles are expected to be sent to the court in due course. Also named as defendants are Doha Bank and two Syrian-Qatari businessmen, the brothers Moutaz and Ramez al-Khayyat. Doha Bank is already defending a separate High Court claim lodged by Syrian refugees in 2019. It alleged that the Khayyat brothers, who own a global construction conglomerate, used accounts at the bank to channel extensive funds to Nusra Front. Doha Bank has said the claim is groundless and without merit.

The new claim alleges that QNB and Doha Bank knew or ought to have known that they were being used to transfer funds to terrorists. If they were unaware of this, it is alleged that they acted unlawfully by failing to monitor their accounts. Doha Bank told The Times the allegations were untrue, as did the Khayyat brothers. QNB said the claims had no factual basis and were categorically untrue. Lawyers acting for Hajri, the Ritz owner, said he unequivocally denied “every single aspect of the allegations insofar as they refer to him”. They said: “Our client has never, directly or indirectly, participated in the funding of terrorism and he has never participated in any conspiracy aimed at providing any support whatsoever to [Nusra Front] during the Syrian civil war.”

Lawyers for the private engineering office of the Amiri Diwan said it was a government entity and “was not and will never be part of an unlawful conspiracy to fund a terrorist organization”. That denial was echoed by the head of the bin Jassim Foundation, Said Mathkar al-Hajri, who said the charity and its members “were not and will never be part of an unlawful conspiracy”. Fuller details of each defendant’s alleged participation in terrorism funding will only be submitted to the court by the claimants after the defendants have been served with copies of the documents that were filed this week in London. All the defendants will be entitled to lodge defense documents or argue that the case should not be heard by the English courts. The claim will only proceed if there is sufficient evidence to support it. Some of those against whom allegations are made suggested it was linked to a campaign by rival countries in an attempt to damage Qatar’s reputation in the West.

A ruthless cartel controls Iraqi borders: AFP

A six-month AFP investigation has found that along Iraq’s borders a corrupt customs-evasion cartel is diverting billions of dollars away from state coffers to line the pockets of armed groups, political parties and crooked officials. The prime beneficiaries are Iran-linked Shiite paramilitaries that intimidate federal officials who dare obstruct them, sometimes through chillingly specific death threats.

The network is so well-oiled and entrenched that revenues are parcelled out among rival groups with remarkably little friction, part of a parallel system that Iraq’s finance minister has described as “state plunder”. “It’s indescribable,” said one Iraqi customs worker. “Worse than a jungle. In a jungle, at least animals eat and get full. These guys are never satisfied.”

Like most of the government officials, port workers and importers interviewed for this story, this worker cited threats to his life and asked to speak anonymously. The network they described arises from Iraq’s glacially slow bureaucracy, fractious politics, limited non-oil industry and endemic corruption that is itself largely a product of years of chaos in the wake of the 2003 US invasion to topple dictator Saddam Hussein.

Customs provide one of the few sources of state revenues, and to keep disparate groups and tribes happy, many of them close to Iran, entry points are divvied up among them and federal duties largely supplanted by bribes. “There’s a kind of collusion between officials, political parties, gangs and corrupt businessmen,” Iraq’s Finance Minister Ali Allawi told AFP.

‘Designed to fail’

Iraq imports a vast majority of its goods — from food and electronics to natural gas — mostly from neighbours Iran and Turkey and from China. Officially, the country of 40 million brought in $21 billion worth of non-oil goods in 2019, the latest year for which full government data is available. Iraq has five official crossings along its 1,600-kilometre (1,000-mile) border with Iran and one on the nearly 370-km frontier with Turkey, while the single biggest and most lucrative gateway is the port of Umm Qasr in the southern province of Basra.

Duties on imports at these points of entry are meant to supplement state revenues from Iraq’s huge oil sector — but they don’t. Iraq’s import system is infamously outdated and cumbersome, with a 2020 World Bank report citing frustrating delays, high compliance fees and frequent exploitation. “If you want to do it the right way, you end up paying in the four figures for demurrage (docking fees) for a single month” in dollar terms, said an importer based in the region. “It’s designed to fail,” he said. An informal parallel system rose in its stead, in which parties and paramilitary groups have divided up Iraq’s land and sea crossings, said officials, port workers, importers and analysts.

Paramilitary groups

Many of Iraq’s entry points are informally controlled by groups within the Hashed al-Shaabi, a powerful state-sponsored armed network close to Iran, as well as other armed factions, officials confirmed to AFP. The Hashed’s members, their allies or their relatives work as border agents, inspectors or police, and are paid by importers who want to skip the official process entirely or get discounts. “If you want a shortcut, you go to the militias or parties,” said an Iraqi intelligence agent who has investigated customs evasion. He said importers effectively tell themselves: “I’d rather lose $100,000 (on a bribe) than lose my goods altogether.”

The Hashed publicly denies the claims. But sources close to its hardline member groups Asaib Ahl al-Haq and Kataeb Hezbollah acknowledged that customs posts are indeed parcelled out in the manner alleged. They cited specific harbour berths, land crossings and products that matched what customs officials and the intelligence agent told AFP.

$10,000 a day in bribes

The Mandali crossing on the Iranian border, for example, is run by the Badr Organisation, an Iraqi movement founded in Iran, port workers, officials and analysts confirmed. An official there boasted to AFP that a border operative can rake in $10,000 per day in bribes, the bulk of which is distributed to the overseeing armed group and complicit officials. In other cases, an armed group controls a particular kind of trade. “If I’m a cigarette trader,” he said, “I go to Kataeb Hezbollah’s economic office in the Jadriyah neighbourhood (of Baghdad), knock on the door, and say: ‘I want to coordinate with you’.”

One key figure is always the “mukhalles” — the state customs agent assigned to an incoming shipment who often doubles as a middleman for an armed group. “There’s no such thing as a neutral mukhalles. They’re all backed by parties,” the intelligence agent said. Once paid — in cash for smaller operations, and by bank wire for larger deals — the mukhalles tampers with paperwork. By misrepresenting the type or amount of goods imported or their value, the customs fee is sharply reduced. One importer told AFP that under-declaring quantities could score a trader discounts of up to 60 percent.

Right connections

For high-tariff goods, meanwhile, the favoured trick is to declare them as something else altogether. Cigarette imports are taxed with a regular import tariff of 30 percent, plus a further 100 percent to encourage consumers to buy local brands. To cut those fees, cigarettes are often recorded as tissues or plastic goods. Facilitators also tamper with a shipment’s estimated total value, which is first marked on the import license but re-evaluated at the point of entry.

In one case described to AFP by an Umm Qasr official, metal reinforcements were valued by the customs agent so cheaply that the importer was charged $200,000 in duties, when he should have paid over $1 million. With the right connections, some cargo slips through with no inspection at all. “I’m not corrupt, but even I have had to wave through cargo I didn’t actually inspect because the shipment was linked to a powerful party,” said the customs worker quoted earlier.

One importer told AFP he paid $30,000 to a customs agent at Umm Qasr to allow through prohibited refurbished electrical equipment. He said he also regularly bribed port police to warn him of surprise inspections. For an additional fee, the officer offered an extra service — to send patrols to hold up rival imports.

‘A real mafia’

With points of entry seen as cash cows, public servants pay their superiors for postings, especially at Umm Qasr. “Minor clerks’ jobs in some outposts change hands for $50,000 to $100,000, and sometimes it goes up to multiples of that,” Allawi, the finance minister, lamented. The subterfuge around the import system “contributes to state plunder,” he told AFP. To protect their pillaging, parties and armed groups use their political influence and threats of violence.

A worker at Mandali told AFP he once delayed a shipment from Iran because of missing paperwork, but then allowed it through, duty-free, after the mukhalles handling the cargo brandished his credentials as a Hashed member. The intelligence officer said an informant at Zerbatiya crossing, which likewise borders Iran and is managed by Asaib Ahl al-Haq, was repeatedly put on leave for blocking efforts to import Iranian produce customs-free and eventually relented. “We came back later to talk to him again and found he had joined Asaib,” the intelligence officer said.

A senior member of Iraq’s border commission told AFP he receives regular calls from private numbers threatening his relatives by name, in an effort to intimidate him into halting cargo inspections. The customs worker was among others who also said they contended with death threats. “We can’t say anything because we’ll be killed,” he said. “People are afraid. This is a real mafia.”

Spoil-sharing

This parallel system has become the lifeblood of Iraqi parties and armed groups, including Iran-backed Hashed factions, said Renad Mansour of the Chatham House think tank. They professionalised this financing stream after Iraq’s defeat of the Islamic State group in 2017. That victory ended the allocation of large defence budgets to the anti-IS military campaign, which included the Hashed, sparking the need to find alternative funding sources. They latched on tighter after Iran came under crippling sanctions imposed by former US president Donald Trump.

In March 2020, the US blacklisted Al Khamael Maritime Services (AKMS), a shipping company in Umm Qasr, for using Shiite paramilitary groups to help the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps “evade Iraqi government inspection protocol”. It also sanctioned two Iraqis and two Iranians linked to AKMS for financing Kataeb and the Lebanese Shiite movement Hezbollah. The spoil-sharing is surprisingly smooth, given the rivalries among parties and armed groups.

“One border point can make up to $120,000 a day,” said Mansour. “This doesn’t go only to one group, but is shared by many, which at times may even seem to be enemies when you zoom out.” Turf wars are rare, but do happen. In February, the separate killings of two members of Asaib Ahl al-Haq were described to AFP by two Hashed sources as “economically motivated”. But usually, the cartel operates smoothy. “There’s no competition,” said the Iraqi intelligence agent. “They know if one of them goes down, they all will.”

Trickling down

The parallel system starves the state of a funding resource for schools, hospitals and other public services at a time when the poverty rate in Iraq has reached 40 percent. “We should get seven billion dollars (a year) from customs,” Allawi told AFP. “In fact, just 10-12 percent of the customs resources reach the finance ministry.” The cost of bribes ultimately also trickles down to the consumer, an Iraqi official said. “As a consumer, you’re the one who ends up paying for that corruption in the store.”

Prime Minister Mustafa al-Kadhemi, within weeks of taking office in May 2020, prioritised border reform, to shore up government revenues hit hard by depressed oil prices. In highly-publicised trips to Umm Qasr and Mandali, he vowed to send new troops to each entry point and regularly swap senior customs staff to break up corrupt circuits. There have been some modest victories. The border commission now reports daily seizures of cargo in cases where importers tried to evade customs fees. And Iraq collected $818 million in duties in 2020, the commission said, slightly higher than the previous year’s $768 million, despite imports being hit by the coronavirus downturn.

Stuttering reforms

But importers, facilitators and even officials have laughed off the premier’s measures. They told AFP that while some importers were now paying government tariffs, they also still paid facilitators to stop goods being arbitrarily held up. “In the end, we’re paying double,” said an Arab businessman, who has imported into Iraq for over a decade. The well-connected, meanwhile, were not affected. “Nothing changed,” said an Iraqi importer, noting he brought in construction materials through Mandali without paying tariffs.

Security forces described chaos. “The police there is all involved in the bribery,” a soldier, whose unit had been briefly deployed to Mandali, told AFP. “The traders drop money like crazy. We arrested one guy but they got him out the next day.” The senior border commission official admitted some promised deployments never happened. “Other times, it’s a joke of a unit” consisting only of “about two dozen guys,” he told AFP. But the main issue, importers and officials agreed, was that staff rotations did not extend to a crucial cog in the corruption machine: the mukhalles. “The main facilitator of corruption is still there,” said the customs official. “One rotten apple will spoil the rest.”

Threat of violence

A US defence official told AFP that Kataeb Hezbollah, accused recently of firing rockets at the US embassy, was ordered to close its office inside Baghdad Airport’s arrivals terminal to stop it from smuggling in high-value goods. “Now they’ve got a position just outside the airport, but they can still drive up to the plane and do what they need to do,” the official said. “Corruption still happens.”

Instead of brazenly phoning each other, facilitators have moved to WhatsApp and other encrypted messaging apps. “Our work has actually become harder because they’re taking more precautions,” the intelligence agent said. The cartel remains intact. Officials said they expect traders to react by increasingly avoiding official border crossings, relying on smuggling instead, or importing goods unofficially through Iraq’s northern Kurdish region. Trying to dismantle the lucrative network completely, they warned, would bring violence Kadhemi may be unprepared for. “A single berth at Umm Qasr is equivalent to a state budget,” the intelligence agent said, using deliberate exaggeration to emphasise the point. “They won’t compromise easily.”

Iraq’s Shia militias announce ‘conditional ceasefire’ on targeting US forces

An array of Shia Iraqi militia groups have agreed to suspend rocket attacks on U.S. forces on condition that Iraq’s government presents a timetable for a withdrawal of American troops, one of the groups said on Sunday. “The factions have presented a conditional ceasefire,” said Mohammed Mohi, spokesman for the Iran-backed Kataib Hezbollah group. “It includes all factions of the (anti-U.S.) resistance, including those who have been targeting U.S. forces.”, he said.

Mohi said the Iraqi government must implement a parliamentary resolution in January that called for the withdrawal from Iraq of foreign troops. The parliament’s decision came after a U.S. drone strike at Baghdad airport killed Iranian military mastermind Qassem Soleimani and Iraq’s top Shi’ite paramilitary chief Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, raising fears of a full-scale Iran-U.S. confrontation on Iraqi soil. Mohi said there was no deadline for the government to implement the decision, but warned: “If America insists on staying and doesn’t respect the parliament’s decision then the factions will use all the weapons at their disposal”.

He said the firing of Katyusha rockets at U.S. forces and diplomatic compounds had been merely “a message that you’re not welcome in the country” and that worse attacks could follow. U.S. officials blame Kataib Hezbollah for dozens of rocket attacks against U.S. installations in Iraq. Kataib Hezbollah denies carrying them out. Smaller and previously unknown militias have claimed some of the attacks. Iraqi security sources believe those groups are linked to Kataib Hezbollah and other larger Iran-aligned militias.

Iraq, US affirm their commitment to American troop withdrawal

Iraq and the United States have affirmed their commitment to the reduction of the number of U.S. troops in Iraq, without giving a timeline.

In a joint statement on the U.S.-Iraq strategic dialogue issued Thursday, the two countries recognized the progress made in eliminating the Islamic State threat, which allows the U.S. to continue to reduce its forces in Iraq over the coming months.

The U.S. will further discuss with the Iraqi government the status of its remaining forces in the country, as they “turn their focus towards developing a bilateral security relationship based on strong mutual interests,” the statement said.

As the U.S. reiterated its commitment to not keep permanent bases or a permanent military presence in Iraq, the Iraqi government said it remains committed “to protecting the military personnel of the International Coalition and the Iraqi facilities hosting them.”

Prime Minister Mustafa al-Kadhimi said during a press conference that “the strategic dialogue with the United States started today. We want to safeguard our sovereignty and ensure that Iraq does not become a zone for settling scores.”

The statement said the U.S. and Iraq will continue their cooperation on economic and energy fields, as well as on political issues.

Briefing with U.S. Assistant Secretary for Near Eastern Affairs David Schenker

The U.S. Assistant Secretary for Near Eastern Affairs David Schenker briefed journalists at the State Department on Thursday. Here are his comments on Iraq:

In April we invited the Government of Iraq to engage in a strategic dialogue under the Strategic Framework Agreement. Our government commenced the first session of the strategic dialogue today via videoconference. The Iraqi delegation was chaired by Senior Under Secretary of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Ambassador Dr. Karim Hashim Mustafa, and the U.S. delegation was chaired by Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Ambassador David Hale. The session discussed several areas of bilateral cooperation, including security, economy, culture, and energy. On the U.S. side, we also had representatives from the Departments of Defense, Treasury, and Energy, as well as the National Security Council.

What we want is to have a strong, normal bilateral security arrangement with Iraq characterized by training, provision of high-quality weapon systems, joint exercises, and senior officers studying at our respective military academies, learning each other’s languages. Security is a bedrock of stability and provides the conditions necessary for economic growth and prosperity. We want to help Iraq in the ultimate defeat of ISIS and bringing stability to Iraq, but Iran-backed groups are working against us in that mission. They’re increasing sectarianism, which fuels radicalism and terrorism, and we discussed this very important issue today.

The Government of Iraq renewed its commitment to us to protect U.S. and other nations’ forces who are in Iraq at the government’s invitation to combat ISIS. We made clear that we’d continue supporting the Iraqi Government, not only through close bilateral cooperation, security, and – on the security and political level, but also in implementing the government’s program and reforms demanded by the Iraqi people. In the context of those reforms, we’ll support the new government through the international financial institutions to help it meet the challenge of COVID-19 and declining oil revenues. We will continue to help Iraqis rebuild from the ISIS genocide by remaining Iraq’s largest humanitarian donor, and we will support the government’s efforts to organize free, fair, and credible elections.

We also discussed the reforms that would be necessary to attract potential world-class U.S. firms to invest in energy and other sectors. In the cultural aspect, our governments discussed plans to return important political archives to the Iraqi Government. We agreed to discuss how our educational, cultural exchange programs and assistance will support cooperation aimed at Iraq’s developmental objective and increasing the capabilities of Iraqi universities with the possibility of additional U.S. funding. Our governments are looking forward to having in-depth conversations about these topics during the meeting of our higher coordination committee, which we hope to host here in Washington D.C. later this summer.

From Syria & Iraq News/VOA News

Foreign ministers from 14 European countries make plea for humanitarian solution in Idlib

Syria – Op-ed by Foreign Ministers of France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Belgium, the Netherlands, Estonia, Poland, Lithuania, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Ireland (26 Feb. 2020)

In Idlib, a new humanitarian disaster is playing out, one of the worst in the Syrian crisis that, in nearly a decade, has caused too many such disasters to count. The Syrian regime continues its strategy of military reconquest of the country at any cost, regardless of the consequences for Syrian civilians. Since December, its operations in the north-west have grown in intensity, with support from Russian aircraft. The unremitting air strikes and the dropping of barrel bombs have forced nearly one million Syrians to flee in just a few weeks. Relief structures are saturated. Hundreds of thousands of people – mostly women and children – are seeking shelter in makeshift camps, and are subjected to cold, hunger and epidemics.

In defiance of international humanitarian law, the strikes deliberately targeted hospitals and health centres – and 79 were forced to shut down – schools, and shelters. A total of 298 civilians have been killed in Idlib since 1 January, based on data from the OHCHR.

It is perfectly clear to us that there are radical groups in Idlib. We would never take terrorism lightly. We are fighting terrorism with determination and are on the front lines of the fight against Daesh. But fighting terrorism cannot and must not justify massive violations of international humanitarian law, which we are witnessing every day in north-west Syria.

The United Nations has warned of the risk of an unprecedented humanitarian crisis if the current offensive continues. We call on the Syrian regime and its supporters to end this offensive and to resume the ceasefire established in autumn 2018. We call on them to immediately end hostilities and honour their obligations under international humanitarian law, including the protection of humanitarian workers and medical personnel, who have lost their lives because of their commitment to civilian populations in Idlib. We also call on Russia to continue negotiations with Turkey in order to de-escalate the dire situation in Idlib and contribute to a political solution.

Beyond the urgency of a truce in Idlib, we call on Russia not to block the Security Council in the coming months from renewing the mechanism allowing for desperately needed cross-border humanitarian aid to be transported to north-west Syria ; a mechanism it has already shut down in the north-east, where we now need to identify alternatives to the Al Yaroubiyah crossing. Who can currently claim that the Syrian regime on its own accord will allow aid to reach those in need, when it bears the greatest responsibility for their situation?

Finally, it is important to remember that only a politically negotiated end to the conflict can serve as a durable conclusion to the Syrian crisis.Political normalization cannot happen before a genuine, irreversible political process is firmly underway. Focused on its military strategy, the regime seeks to undermine any type of inclusive political process, by blocking all constitutional discussions planned in Geneva under the aegis of UN Special Envoy Geir Pedersen. But the reconquest under way is an illusion and the same causes will produce the same effects: radicalization, instability in Syria and in the region, and exile, in a country where more than half the population is displaced or living as refugees. We have to acknowledge the tremendous efforts Syria’s neighbours are undertaking, to provide shelter to these Syrians that had to leave their homes.

In the face of the tragedy unfolding, Europeans, too, are shouldering their responsibilities. From a humanitarian standpoint, the European Union and its Member States are the largest donors in support of the Syrian population. We will sustain and expand these collective efforts in reaction to the developing crisis in Idlib.

Europe continues to apply pressure on the regime to genuinely engage in the political process. On 17 February, Europeans adopted fresh sanctions that target, on an individual basis, Syrian businesspersons who are fuelling the regime’s war efforts and benefiting from its impact.

It is also our responsibility to fight impunity with regard to the crimes committed in Syria. It is a matter of principle and justice. It is also a necessary condition for sustainable peace, in a Syrian society that has been torn apart by nearly ten years of conflict. We intend to continue to support the mechanisms to fight impunity that have been established by the United Nations, which conduct work to collect proof that will be vital in the preparation of future proceedings against those who are responsible for the most serious crimes: the Commission of Inquiry on the Syrian Arab Republic and the International, Impartial and Independent Mechanism. We will also continue our work to refer cases to the International Criminal Court. We will maintain our commitment, including within the framework of our national jurisdictions, to ensure that the crimes committed in Syria do not go unpunished. Such crimes have included the use of chemical weapons, breaching most fundamental norms of international law. We need to establish responsibilities and we need accountability. And we need clarity on what happened to the many detainees and missing persons.

U.S. Special Ops raided Soleimani’s convoy right after the drone attack

American special operations soldiers raided the site of the U.S. bombing on Qassem Soleimani and Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis’ convoy near Baghdad international airport on January 3, just seconds after the U.S. MQ-9 Reaper drone finished the bombing and the shooting of the convoy and its passengers, according to a Fox News report.

The wreckage of the car that Qassem Soleimani was riding during the U.S. bombing near Baghdad airport on January 3 [Photo: U.S. Army via Fox News]

According to a U.S. government source that spoke to Fox News, the American special ops troops following Soleimani’s convoy were about a half-mile behind when it was hit by a missile fired from the drone. They were on the scene within a minute or two and performed a so-called “bomb damage assessment,” taking pictures of the scene and confirming that the drone had picked out the right car — and that Soleimani was confirmed to be killed. The source told Fox News that the U.S. forces dragged Soleimani’s body away from the scene and extinguished the fire before formally identifying the Iranian general. They took photos of his possessions, which included books of poetry and wads of cash. He was reportedly also carrying a pistol and an assault rifle.

Qassem Soleimani’s body lies burning next to the car he was riding after the U.S. drone strike near Baghdad airport on January 3, 2020 [Photo: U.S. Army via Fox News]
Some of the items Qassem Soleimani was carrying when he died following a U.S. drone strike near Baghdad airport on January 3, 2020. His phone is partially visible at the top left. [Photo: U.S. Army via Fox News]

 

U.S. State Department tells Iraq it will not discuss U.S. troop withdrawal

The U.S. State Department said in a statement Friday that the U.S. will not hold discussions with Iraq regarding American troop withdrawal from the country. “At this time, any delegation sent to Iraq would be dedicated to discussing how to best recommit to our strategic partnership — not to discuss troop withdrawal, but our right, appropriate force posture in the Middle East,” State Department spokesperson Morgan Ortagus said in a statement. “There does, however, need to be a conversation between the U.S. and Iraqi governments not just regarding security, but about our financial, economic, and diplomatic partnership. We want to be a friend and partner to a sovereign, prosperous, and stable Iraq,” Ortagus added, writing that “America is a force for good in the Middle East.”

The latest revelation from the State Department further deepens confusion over plans for U.S. troops in the region. On Sunday, Iraq’s parliament passed a nonbinding resolution calling for the removal of American forces and other foreign troops from the country in the wake of a U.S. airstrike in Iraq that killed Iran’s top general, Qasem Soleimani. A day later, a letter from U.S. Marine Corps Gen. William Seely to Iraq’s Defense Ministry said the withdrawal of U.S. coalition troops was occurring “in due deference to the sovereignty of the Republic of Iraq, and as requested” by the nation’s Prime Minister, Adel Abdul-Mahdi, and the Iraqi parliament. In the letter, Seely wrote that coalition troops “will be repositioning forces over the course of the coming days and weeks to prepare for onward movement.” “In order to conduct this task, Coalition Forces are required to take certain measures to ensure the movement out of Iraq is conducted in a safe and efficient manner,” he added.

In the wake of the letter, the Pentagon acknowledged that the letter informing Iraq’s Defense Ministry that U.S.-led coalition troops would leave Iraq “was a mistake.” “A draft unsigned letter that was acquired by an Iraqi official has no import. It has no value whatsoever,” Secretary of Defense Mark Esper said Tuesday in an interview with CNN. “I will say this, the United States is not withdrawing from Iraq. In fact, in my conversations with my counterpart, the Iraqi defense minister, I conveyed to him that we do want to stay in Iraq and we want to continue the important defeat ISIS mission,” he added. “That letter is a draft, it was a mistake, it was unsigned, it should never have been released,” Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Mark Milley told reporters at the Pentagon on Monday. “Poorly worded, implies withdrawal,” Milley said. “That is not what’s happening.” Alongside Milley, Esper told reporters earlier in the day that the U.S. was “repositioning forces throughout the region.”

On Tuesday, Iraq’s Prime Minister Adel Abdul-Mahdi said that the U.S. military sent a letter regarding American troop withdrawal from the country but that the English version did not match the Arabic version. Abdul-Mahdi said that his country requested clarifications on U.S. plans.

Sources: Syria & Iraq News/CNBC